[CFBHC] How should my depth chart be formatted?

[Soluna 18,857]

You're welcome to change the fonts to the below layout but please keep the names of units the exact same as listed here. Simply list your players below each heading, please leave a space after the last listed player per block, prior to the next heading.

 

Minimum required sections:

Offense

Quarterback

Running Back

Fullback

Wide Receivers

Tight Ends

Left Tackle

Left Guard

Center

Right Guard

Right Tackle

 

Defense

Left Defensive End

Defensive Tackles

Right Defensive End

Left Outside Linebacker

Inside Linebackers

Right Outside Linebacker

Cornerbacks

Free Safety

Strong Safety

 

Special Teams

Kicker

Punter

Longsnapper

Kick Returner

Punt Returner

Holder

 

Inactive

 

Redshirts

 

Transfer Ineligible (Incoming)

 

Transfer Ineligible (Outgoing)

Alternative labels can be found below. These are entirely optional but would be read correctly. Each should be after it's main designation above. For example 3rd Down Running Back should be listed after Running Back

Spoiler

 

Possible alternative sections that you may add if you want to designate them:

Short Yardage Quarterback

3rd Down Running Back

Short Yardage Running Back

Slot Wide Receiver

Receiving Tight End

Blocking Tight End

Nose Tackle

Will Linebacker

Mike Linebacker
Sam Linebacker

Jack Linebacker

Bandit Linebacker

Nickelback

Dimeback

Kickoff Specialist

Gunner

Jammer

Upback

Utility

 

 

[acewulf 2,490]

21 minutes ago, Soluna said:

Alternative labels can be found below. These are entirely optional but would be read correctly. Each should be after it's main designation above. For example 3rd Down Running Back should be listed after Running Back

  Hide contents

 

Possible alternative sections that you may add if you want to designate them:

3rd Down Running Back

Slot Wide Receiver

Receiving Tight End - Not available yet, but coming soon!

Blocking Tight End - Not available yet, but coming soon!

Nose Tackle

Will Linebacker

Mike Linebacker
Sam Linebacker

Jack Linebacker

Nickelback

Dimeback

Kickoff Specialist

Gunner - Not available yet, but coming soon!

Jammer - Not available yet, but coming soon!

 

 

I am so excited for this!

[TazerMan 754]

Gasm

[believer 917]

ALTERNATIVE LABELS LETS GO

[sleuthofbears 1,244]

Alternative labels look like they'll be awesome, thanks Soluna!

[TazerMan 754]

Just to clarify, how would you put in the alternative labels for linebackers?

[pumph 1,888]

For defensive tackles....

 

If I play a 3-4 and want my 2-gaps to start as the Nose tackle and primary backup, but have a 1-gap that I want to use in nickle and dime situations, would I then list the 1-gap as one of the top 2 DTs and the 2-gaps at nose?  Or does a 3-4 team play a 3-3-5/3-2-6 for nickle and dime situations?

[HAFFnHAFF 2,882]

51 minutes ago, pumph said:

For defensive tackles....

 

If I play a 3-4 and want my 2-gaps to start as the Nose tackle and primary backup, but have a 1-gap that I want to use in nickle and dime situations, would I then list the 1-gap as one of the top 2 DTs and the 2-gaps at nose?  Or does a 3-4 team play a 3-3-5/3-2-6 for nickle and dime situations?

 

3-4 teams typically run 3-3-5 or 2-4-5. for nickel and 3-2-5 for dime. 

[HAFFnHAFF 2,882]

So if I want to specify my LBs as Sam, mike, and will do I still list lolb, ilb, rolb and hen most the alternative designations after that?

[lucas 504]

Nut 

[Rocketcan 1,066]

I assume a Jack LB is kinda like a LB/S hybrid?

[Rome 6,547]

19 minutes ago, Rocketcan said:

I assume a Jack LB is kinda like a LB/S hybrid?

 

No, the Jack is usually used to denote the hybrid DE/OLB position that many modern 3-4s use. Tends to be the bigger OLBs/smaller DEs. Basically the pass rushing LB.

[Rocketcan 1,066]

58 minutes ago, Rome said:

 

No, the Jack is usually used to denote the hybrid DE/OLB position that many modern 3-4s use. Tends to be the bigger OLBs/smaller DEs. Basically the pass rushing LB.

 

Thanks, Rome.

 

Also, about Nose Tackle: If I run a 4-3, but I want to distinguish between my Nose and my Under tackle, can I use this designation?

[Emperor 2,434]

Alternative labels list might be the thing I never knew I needed most

 

So if I list a slot WR, will the WR3 essentially have the same role that a WR4 would have had a separate slot designation not been made?

[Soluna 18,857]

14 hours ago, Rocketcan said:

 

Thanks, Rome.

 

Also, about Nose Tackle: If I run a 4-3, but I want to distinguish between my Nose and my Under tackle, can I use this designation?

 

9 hours ago, Emperor_of_Orange said:

Alternative labels list might be the thing I never knew I needed most

 

So if I list a slot WR, will the WR3 essentially have the same role that a WR4 would have had a separate slot designation not been made?

Both correct

[Soluna 18,857]

Added Bandit Linebacker

[Soluna 18,857]

Bandit is OLB/SS hybrid in this case.

[Rome 6,547]

If we start using the alternate linebacker designations, can we mix and match within reason? For example, can we use a Sam - Mike - Bandit - Jack or a Bandit - Mike - Will - Jack?

[cmcgill 2,047]

6 minutes ago, Rome said:

If we start using the alternate linebacker designations, can we mix and match within reason? For example, can we use a Sam - Mike - Bandit - Jack or a Bandit - Mike - Will - Jack? 

 

To add, do we need to keep it at 4 LBs tops, or, like slot WR and nickle CB, can we assume the Sam, Mike, Will, and Jack will play most of the time with a Bandit rotating in for passing plays?

[GigemAgs 1,157]

On 7/22/2018 at 8:53 AM, HAFFnHAFF said:

So if I want to specify my LBs as Sam, mike, and will do I still list lolb, ilb, rolb and hen most the alternative designations after that?

 

 

Also curious about this. Do we list them twice or is Sam/Mike/Will/Jack Sufficient like what @cmcgill did here?
 

 

[Soluna 18,857]

The specialized ones will only apply if you run a formation in your gameplan that uses that player. If you do not run a valid formation they are not used. Everyone MUST designate the normal designations.

[mahrowkeen 1,395]

With the introduction of the "Bandit", will we see recruits that fit the role? 

 

10 minutes ago, Soluna said:

The specialized ones will only apply if you run a formation in your gameplan that uses that player. If you do not run a valid formation they are not used. Everyone MUST designate the normal designations.

 

So the Bandit applies to the 4-3 specifically? Just trying to be claro.

[Soluna 18,857]

7 hours ago, mahrowkeen said:

With the introduction of the "Bandit", will we see recruits that fit the role? 

 

 

So the Bandit applies to the 4-3 specifically? Just trying to be claro.

 

No it applies to defensive secondary schemes that use a bandit. A 4-3 doesn't use a bandit.

[mahrowkeen 1,395]

1 minute ago, Soluna said:

 

No it applies to defensive secondary schemes that use a bandit. A 4-3 doesn't use a bandit.

Cool, thanks

[Rocketcan 1,066]

So 4-3, for example will never use Jack or Bandit, just Sam, Mike and Will? Just trying to clarify.